For centuries, scholars, theologians, and explorers alike have speculated about the true location of the Garden of Eden—an ethereal paradise described in the Book of Genesis as the birthplace of humanity. This lush sanctuary, where Adam and Eve are said to have lived in perfect harmony with nature before their fateful fall from grace, has remained an enduring mystery.
Now, in a bold and controversial claim, a computer scientist has suggested that the long-lost Garden may not be where most have assumed. According to Dr. Konstantin Borisov, Eden is not in Mesopotamia, but rather beneath one of Egypt’s most iconic and mysterious structures—the Great Pyramid of Giza.
This audacious proposal challenges centuries of biblical interpretation and invites a fresh lens through which to view the ancient text and the geographical clues it contains.
A Paradise Lost… or Just Misplaced?
The story of Eden, as outlined in Genesis, is among the most well-known in the Judeo-Christian tradition. Adam and Eve, humanity’s first beings, are said to have lived in a divine garden created by God. They existed in a state of innocence until a serpent persuaded Eve to eat the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge—an act that revealed their nakedness and led to their eventual expulsion.
According to the scripture, this garden was watered by a river that split into four separate streams: the Pishon, Gihon, Tigris, and Euphrates. Of these, the Tigris and Euphrates are well known—both flow through modern-day Iraq and have been central to the development of civilization in Mesopotamia. The other two rivers, however, remain a mystery.
The biblical passage reads:
“A river watering the garden flowed from Eden; from there it was separated into four headwaters. The name of the first is the Pishon; it winds through the entire land of Havilah, where there is gold… The name of the second river is the Gihon; it winds through the entire land of Cush. The name of the third river is the Tigris… And the fourth river is the Euphrates.”
Because of this reference, many scholars have historically placed the Garden of Eden somewhere in or near ancient Mesopotamia. Yet, Dr. Borisov believes this common assumption may be flawed.
Read more: Scientists Are Investigating Puzzling Underground ‘Anomaly’ Near the Giza Pyramids
A Radical Reinterpretation
In his recent publication, Dr. Konstantin Borisov proposes a new theory that repositions the Garden of Eden in Egypt, with the Nile River standing in as the biblical Gihon. Even more provocatively, he suggests that the Tree of Eternal Life—the very tree that Adam and Eve were forbidden to eat from—once stood on the site now occupied by the Great Pyramid of Giza.
His conclusion stems from a combination of ancient cartography, biblical analysis, and geographic reinterpretation. Dr. Borisov examined ancient maps dating back to around 500 BC, noting a recurring motif: a world surrounded by a river known as “Oceanus.” At the northernmost point of this river lay a place labeled “Paradise.”
According to Borisov, these ancient maps offer significant clues about the location of Eden. “By studying the map, it becomes clear that the only four rivers flowing from Oceanus were the Nile, Tigris, Euphrates, and the Indus,” he explained. This reinterpretation reconfigures the traditional understanding of the river system described in Genesis and moves the focus away from Mesopotamia toward Northeast Africa and South Asia.
The Giza Connection
The idea that the Great Pyramid of Giza may be tied to the Garden of Eden is particularly fascinating and controversial. Constructed over 4,500 years ago, the pyramid has long been a subject of speculation, revered for its precision and enigmatic origins. Now, Dr. Borisov suggests that it may have been built on the very spot where the Tree of Eternal Life once grew.
He theorizes that early civilizations, aware of the spiritual significance of the site, may have chosen it deliberately to house their greatest architectural achievement. The pyramid, then, would serve not only as a royal tomb but as a monument to a deeper, more ancient sacred tradition.
Though the claim lacks direct archaeological evidence, it offers a novel interpretation of biblical geography, drawing connections between sacred texts and the physical world in ways rarely considered.
Alternative Theories and Interpretations
Of course, Dr. Borisov’s theory is far from universally accepted. The notion of locating the Garden of Eden has inspired many other interpretations throughout history, both serious and satirical.
Some interpretations, including those within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (commonly known as the Mormon Church), place the Garden of Eden not in the Middle East or Africa, but in North America—specifically in Jackson County, Missouri. While this idea may sound far-fetched to some, it underscores just how varied the interpretations of this mythical location can be.
Others have attempted to locate Eden using geological or archaeological data, tying its existence to real floodplains and ancient water systems. In recent decades, some scientists have also claimed to discover remnants of Noah’s Ark on Mount Ararat in Turkey, another biblical mystery linked to humanity’s early days.
Still, a prevailing academic view holds that the Garden of Eden may be more metaphorical than literal—a symbolic tale designed to convey moral and spiritual lessons rather than geographical truths.
Read more: DNA Testing Cracks 3,300-Year-Old Mystery of King Tut’s Death
Between Myth and Mystery
Despite the lack of concrete proof, the search for Eden remains deeply compelling. Whether viewed as a physical location, a lost civilization, or an allegorical paradise, the Garden of Eden symbolizes something universally human: the longing for a pure, unspoiled beginning.
Dr. Borisov’s theory may not convince everyone, but it invites fresh discussion and challenges us to reconsider the ancient stories that continue to shape our worldview. Could Eden have been in Egypt all along? Or is it forever beyond our reach—a myth meant to live only in the realm of the imagination?
As long as questions remain, the Garden of Eden will likely continue to spark curiosity and debate, reminding us that the line between history, belief, and mystery is often as elusive as the paradise we’ve been searching for all along.
Featured image: Freepik.
